The reality of ESG assurance
ESG teams spend more time building the file than exercising the judgment it exists to support.
Teams focused on sustainability often exhaust their energy on routine operations.
One important detail can hide deep within reports exceeding 200 pages of lengthy documents. Miss it, and the opportunity to act on it disappears.
None of this is judgment.
All of it is time.
With BetterWorld
Mapping evidence that took weeks is done in minutes.
Everything auditors need to prepare, review, and close an engagement, faster.
Accelerated and more reliable reporting cycles.
Teams shift focus from routine administration to strategy.
Gap analysis
Every requirement, pinned to the page.
Verify any verdict in one click: open a requirement and the report jumps to the exact sentence its evidence came from. No more re-checking work nobody can trace.
The report names entity types on page 3, but the complete list only appears in Note 14. Both spans ground the verdict.
The Group's sustainability reporting covers its principal operating subsidiaries where the Group holds a controlling interest and exercises operational control.
A complete list of the 47 consolidated entities is set out in Note 14 to the financial statements, together with the reporting boundary applied for FY2024.
Every verdict can be re-performed: click the citation, read the page, agree or correct it. That is what makes AI output reviewable in an assurance workflow, whatever standard you audit against.
Human in the loop
Disagree? Redirect the agent.
Tell it what to look at in plain English. It re-reads the document and returns an updated verdict, rationale and confidence in seconds, versioned and logged.
- Point it to sections, tables or notes it should weigh
- Every re-analysis is versioned and logged
- Feedback is integrated into the rationale, not lost in chat
Collaboration
Review it live, together.
Comment on any rationale or evidence span. Your whole engagement team works in the same analysis at once, with presence, threads and resolution built in.
- Threads attach to the clause, not to a screenshot
- Unresolved comments surface in one queue
- Comments travel into the exported workbook
Documentation
From analysis to audit file, in one canvas.
Drag sections onto a free-form working paper, let AI turn meeting notes into suggestions, run web research against disclosures, then export to a complete and defensible workbook for your submission.
Vouch the 47-entity list in Note 14 against the FY2024 consolidation schedule; document the two equity-accounted JVs excluded from boundary.
Boundary risk: recent Vietnam acquisition (Mar 2024) may be omitted from the sustainability reporting scope.
Verify completeness of the entity list disclosed under GRI 2-2-a for FY2024 sustainability reporting.
Vouched Note 14 (47 entities) to the consolidation schedule. Two equity-accounted JVs excluded, documented in boundary memo.
Vietnam acquisition (Mar 2024) not yet reflected in reporting boundary. Raised with management.
The web sweep checks what a report claims against live sources and flags contradictions, not just confirmations. Every source is scored and filed with the working paper.
Trust & security
Co-designed with assurance practitioners.
Built with assurance firms, to the confidentiality standards their engagements demand.
Encrypted end to end
In transit and at rest, in an isolated workspace with role-based access control.
Zero retention, no training
Client reports never train models and are never retained beyond your workspace.
Evidence-first verdicts
Every verdict cites a page-level span you can click and verify before it enters the file.
Audit-file exports
Workbooks with index sheet, sign-off blocks and a full trail, ready for ISA 230 documentation.
Built for
ESG assurance teams
External and internal auditors who need defensible, evidence-based assessments.
Sustainability reporting teams
Reporting teams checking completeness before the auditors do.
Get in touch.
Tell us a bit about your team and pick a time. 30 minutes to talk through where BetterWorld could fit into your review process.
- 1 Your details
- 2 Pick a slot
- 3 Talk through your workflow
Details received. Now grab a slot. Your name and email are pre-filled.
This cites the boundary description on p.3, not the entity list in Note 14. Should this stay Partial?
Priya Nair · 14:32 ResolveAgree. Sending to re-analysis with a note to weight Note 14 as primary evidence.
James Wong · 14:33 Send to re-analysis